top of page

Recent Posts

Archive

Tags

Is ScienceDomain International a scam? Is there any real proof behind this allegation?

It has been noted that several academicians from world renowned universities like Harvard, university, Cambridge, University of Chicago, university, University of Göttingen, etc have printed their valuable papers with Sciencedomain journals. Please see gere for a few proof (http://www.sciencedomain.org/pag...). likely these academicians have trustworthy Sciencedomain International thanks to clear policies that embody the standards of critique method (Advanced Open Peer review), sensible assortment coverage, high editorial benchmarks, and plenty of additional. One should bear the terms and conditions of submission and publication policies so as to own a transparent plan concerning the operating type of this publisher. This publisher has forever centered on providing readers with relevant data with none problem.

As per a report (Link) of 1 of the world’s most renowned journal (Science),one of the journal of Sciencedomain (British Journal of Pharmaceutical Research) passed a demanding take a look at of quality of critique by rejecting a faux article (Link1, Link2, Link3). this can be a verifiable proof of the dedication and hard-work of the peer reviewers and editors to take care of the high normal of journals. it absolutely was according that out of total 304 journals, solely twenty journals rejected the faux article when substantial critique. Sciencedomain’s journal was among these few prosperous journals together with trade leaders like PLoS One, Hindawi, etc. it’s imperative that the results of this experiment conjointly proved the efficaciousness of clear Advanced OPEN critique and ‘post publication’ peer review system.

All these examples clearly stand against the regulation of some predatory publishers, UN agency don’t offer any critique service and don’t provide the essential services of a typical studious publisher.

Reference: Who’s petrified of Peer Review? Science, 2013: Vol. 342 no. 6154 pp. 60–65, DOI: 10.1126/science.342.6154.60

See More Information


bottom of page